Monday, June 13, 2011

Instructional Alternatives Comparison

     When reflecting and comparing different instructional alternatives, it is my opinion that contrasting each noted type there is simply a matter of personal preference. As we have explored, there are different ways that different people learn and are conditioned to learn. As technology has evolved, the era of programmed and computer-assisted instruction has become an extremely popular way to learn. There are many computer programs that walk you through learning step by step and have interactive elements where students or eager learners complete practice drills and or complete assignments to demonstrate proficiency. As many are pressed for time, this has become a very popular way to learn and complete higher education degrees and certifications.
     In striking contrasts, student-team, pupil-team, and cooperative learning is also a popular method utilized in learning, this is similar to what we do at Central Methodist University in the adult degree program. Created learning teams allow for independent work as well as projects that require collaboration with fellow classmates. This cooperative learning allows for group scoring and also allows for team members to build on each others strengths and weaknesses. Life and business experiences of learning team members also add to the learning of the group as "real" life teaching experiences are brought to the table and expanded on in classroom and group settings, and is generally a benefit.
Once again, I do believe that a combination of instructional alternatives benefit learners, and the independent learners will develop a personal preference for the method that is most beneficial to them.

"You cannot open a book without learning something"  Confucius


 

No comments:

Post a Comment